Tis Good To Be A Post
- Academia is an office job
- More YouTube: Robot Dance
- Hurra Torpedo
- Counting in Iraq: Update I
- Caption Contest #4 Winner
- Midsummer Night's Eve
- Self-Indulgent Work Update Post
- Cup Blogging
- Academic monographs costs and profits
- Caption Contest Held Over
The Dark Backward
- Advice at Your Own Risk
- Ancrene Wiseass
- Angry Professor
- Bardiac
- Berube
- Bitch PhD
- Blotted Lines
- b l o g o s
- Carnivalesque
- Confessions of a CC Dean
- Early Modern Notes
- Early Modern Whale
- Easily Distracted
- Ferule and Fescue
- The Freudian Petticoat
- Geoffrey Chaucer Hath a Blog
- Got Medieval
- Historianess
- History Carnival
- In Favor of Thinking
- The Little Professor
- New Kid on the Hallway
- Philobiblon
- Profgrrrrl
- Renaissance Lit
- separated by a common language
- Serendipities
- Sound and Fury
- Textual Studies, 1500-1800
- The Valve
- Balkinization
- Brad DeLong
- Clublife
- Crooks & Liars
- Daily Howler
- Forksplit
- Freakonomics
- Glenn Greenwald
- Kevin Drum
- Post-Traumatic SAA Syndrome
- SAA: Rumors
- SAA: Really quite a nice conference
- SAA: Caring Makes Me Tired
- MLA Date Change
- MLA if you ARE doing interviews ...
- MLA Day Three: A Day of Shreds and Patches
- MLA Day Two: In which I attend no sessions
- MLA Blogging, part one
- Further Indignities from Kline
- It's Conservative Academic Silly Season Again
- SAA Day Three: "Thrown Into Taint"
- More on SAA Day Two
- SAA Day One: Look Me in the Eye
- Where Not to Have Your Next Reception
- On Pre-Conference Feedback for SAA
- RSA Day Three: I think I insulted someone
- RSA Day One: The New Zombiism Rises
- Usually Uniface in San Francisco
- "I did not want to write political allegory"
- Plato and Bucer, Religion and Sex
- The Uses of Intellectual History
- Political Theologies: An Overview
- No. 7 (winning entry)
- No. 6 (winning entry)
- No. 5 (winning entry)
- No. 4 (winning entry)
- No. 3 (winning entry)
- No. 2 (winning entry)
- No. 1 (winning entry)
- About this project
- The Puritan Widow (c.1607)
- Love's Cure (c.1606/1629)
- The Gentleman Usher (1606)
- The Sparagus Garden (1635)
- The Old Law (c.1618)
- All's Lost by Lust (c.1619)
- Happy Mother's Day, EEBO!
- In Purgatorio
- Early Modern Waterboarding
- Rowlands's Etymologies of Names of Contempt
- Hugh Plat
- The Roundhead's Reply?
- An Odd Ballad: "My Bird is a Round-head"
- Gascoigne's Noble Arte of Venerie
At 7/12/2006 10:04:00 AM, Simplicius wrote…
I'm guessing here...
A palmer (sans palm branch), a potycary (disguised as a paynim--that's some sword he's carrying, which of course would be highly useful in creating fine-grained herb and powder concoctions), and a pardoner (what's he toting?).
The woodcut figures clearly do not correspond to the four PP of the title, do they? Do you know what Luborsky has to say on the matter?
At 7/12/2006 12:36:00 PM, jw wrote…
I just appreciate that a potycary is so high he's levitating.
At 7/12/2006 01:17:00 PM, Anonymous wrote…
my word verification this time is CQUEER. how very mery!
At 7/13/2006 06:42:00 PM, Pamphilia wrote…
Well, if we go by orthography, it should be the 'Potycary who is not pictured, since he's really an "A" and not a "P." Unless there's some sort of pun on "Potty-Carry" going on here. Maybe he hangs out with Arsemetricians.
More importantly, why are they all dressed in fashions from the previous century.
I wish Ruth Luborsky were still alive. She was great.
At 7/14/2006 09:08:00 AM, Adam wrote…
maybe it's the old joke: the fourth person, named but not shown, is the reader.like all those woodcuts of 'four rogues', showing three rogues, plus (ho ho ho) the reader.
my word verification was ieyyd: a small, hairless creature, somewhat like a stoat.
At 7/14/2006 12:03:00 PM, Hieronimo wrote…
maybe it's the old joke: the fourth person, named but not shown, is the reader
Hey Adam, thanks for the comment. Would that make the reader the "peddler"? Or perhaps the fourth person is the stationer selling the book?
Still haven't checked my copy of Luborsky--sorry all; will do.
At 7/16/2006 04:48:00 PM, Pamphilia wrote…
I think Adam is totally right. I think it's like the line from 'Twelfth Night," "Did you ever see the picture of We Three?" which is really a reference to a picture of two Asses, if I remember correctly. The third being the viewer, another sort of ass . . .
At 7/28/2006 12:20:00 AM, Inkhorn wrote…
I love the picture of we three. I've somehow managed always to hide that fact from my students, who I somehow feel wouldn't appreciate it the way I do.
Scribble some marginalia
<< Main